Skip to main content

Experts stress on predictable regulatory environment to create global trust in India as a stable clinical trial market

Experts in the clinical trial arena are of the view that there is an urgent need for a predictable regulatory environment in the country to create global trust in India as a stable clinical trial market. But, they rued that developments in the last few years have dented the confidence of sponsors in doing clinical research in India. 

India is on a slow recovery period and there is a need to ensure that it continues the growth trajectory.

"Various factors, including reports of alleged irregularities in clinical trials have also led to a lot of misinformation and negative perceptions of clinical trials in India. Besides this, some of the clauses of The Draft Clinical Trial Rules 2018 around compensation are regressive and, if implemented, could force sponsors  both domestic and foreign to reconsider doing clinical trials in India,"explains Naz Haji, Managing Director, IQVIA India. 

Formed through the merger of IMS Health and Quintiles, IQVIA is a leading global provider of information, innovative technology solutions and contract research services.

Echoing similar views, experts pointed out that India is still recovering from the setback of 2013 and any further setback will hurt country's image further and seriously impact ability to attract clinical research into the country, besides denying patients access to the latest treatment options. Regulators should have more consultative meetings with stakeholders to review these contentious clauses, while ensuring that patient safety, confidentiality and quality are not compromised. 

Continue reading this article

ᐧ

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BE guidelines regarding investigator

BE guidelines recommend investigator should possess appropriate medical qualification, experience for conducting pharmacokinetic studies Can chairperson of EC directly write to sponsor to clarify some of the queries of clinical trial raised in EC meeting? Dr. Sreevatsa Please see an extract from FDA's comment on IRB-sponsor relationship. The interrelationship and interaction between the research sponsor (e.g., drug, biologic and device manufacturers), the clinical investigator and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) may be very complex. The regulations do not prohibit direct sponsor-IRB contacts, although, the sponsor-IRB interaction customarily occurs through the investigator who conducts the clinical study. The clinical investigator generally provides the communication link between the IRB and the sponsor. Such linkage is agreed to by the sponsors and investigators when they sign forms FDA-1571 and FDA-1572, respectively, for drug and biologic studies or a...
Post a Comment
Read more

ICH GCP requires EC members to be independent of investigator and sponsor to avoid conflicts of interest

Can an Ethics Committee member e.g. layman/chairman or anyone in the committee participate in the trial as a subject? Vidya If an Ethics Committee member becomes a trial subject on a trial that he/she was involved in approving then there has been a major conflict of interest. The following situations need to be considered: ● IEC member reviews study without any prior knowledge of the study, votes, and then afterwards is approached by clinical research team to participate. Possibly this is OK but the member should no longer be part of the IEC that reviews that study. This will be difficult in practice, so therefore it is not advisable. ● IEC member already knows about the study and is voting in order to be able to participate. This is clearly not acceptable and made worse if there is additional financial incentive for the study (e.g. volunteer study). ICH GCP requires Ethics Committee members to be independent of the investigator and the sponsor to avoid confl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Combination Vaccine for Kids withdrawn

A vaccine that combines conventional MMR (Measles, Mumps, Rubella) with Chikenpox has been withdrawn in the United States due to a higher rate of seizures in children. In a study children aged 12 to 23 months who received the combined MMR cum Chickenpox vaccine had double the rate of seizures compared to children who got separate vaccine for MMR and chickenpox. This equates to one additional case of convulsion per 2000 vaccinations.
Post a Comment
Read more