Skip to main content

Bangalore scientists develop new TB drug regimen with better outcomes, lower toxicity

Tuberculosis causes 250,000 deaths in India each year

Researchers at the Indian Institute of Science (IIS) have discovered a new drug combination that promises better outcome in treating Tuberculosis (TB), which causes 250,000 deaths in India each year.

Animal studies on mice shows that the drug Pranlukast (PRK) not only killed tuberculosis bacteriumbut also compromised its survival strategies within the cells, said the research, published in the February issue of online journal, EMBO Molecular Medicine.

"The problem with TB is the bacterium keeps developing resistance against new drugs and at least 15 drugs have been abandoned so far, either due to resistance against the drug or severe toxicity," says Dr Avdhesha Suroli, lead researcher of the project.

"Our research has proved this combination could work better and be an effective addition to the TB drug pipeline that needs to be reinvented frequently. We need the government or pharma companies to come forward and conduct Phase II trials to know the efficacy and dosage escalation," said Dr Suroli, who led the six-member team that has been working on the project for the past five years.

The researchers propose a combination of Pranlukast with the standard-of-care therapy drugs, to be highly efficient against Tb pathogen, thereby providing an opportunity to use this novel drug combination for TB therapeutics.

"Three drugs are currently being used — Isoniazid, Rifampin and Ethambutol -- in combination therapy and we recommend Ethambutol be replaced with PRK as it could work better," says Dr Suroli.

PRK has the potential to be included directly into the therapeutic regime against Tb as it has approval for treatment of asthma in the US, Japan and Europe.

Although the past decade has seen major developments in the TB drug discovery pipeline, there is a constant need for improved therapeutic interventions.

Continue reading here.

ᐧ

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Registration of herbal trials in CTRI is not mandatory

A trial patient visited the site complaining breathlessness and tachycardia. The investigator advised hospitalization but as subject could not afford the expenses, he refused for admission. Is this an SAE because investigator advised hospitalization? G Praveen Kumar. If the patient was not hospitalized, it does not fall into SAE criteria of hospitalization. However, it appears from your mail that the PI felt that the event was serious enough to admit the subject for treatment. This makes it an “important medical event." As per ICH E2A such event also are considered serious. See the ICH E2A excerpt below: Medical and scientific judgement should be exercised in deciding whether expedited reporting is appropriate in other situations, such as important medical events that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalisation but may jeopardise the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the defin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Evidence for Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs Called into Question

Despite massive advertising and booming prescriptions, use and sales, the new atypical antipsychotic medications such as Seroquel and Abilify – used to treat schizophrenia , bipolar disorder, depression and other illnesses – lack sufficient evidence to support their widespread and generalized usage. This according to a new study out of the Stanford University School of Medicine and University of Chicago. In the past decade, atypical antipsychotics have rocketed past many commonly prescribed, but older antidepressant and other psychiatric medications. Although initially touted as having few side effects, followup studies have found that atypical antipsychotics have serious side effects, including significant weight gain that can lead to diabetes and heart disease. “Because these drugs have safety issues, physicians should prescribe them only when they are sure patients will get substantial benefits,” said Randall Stafford, M.D., Ph.D., a Stanford associate pro...
Post a Comment
Read more

In India, there is no separate guidance on pregnancy reporting

How will we conclude that the subject is illiterate? Dr Prakash Atlam The guidelines don’t use the term illiterate. Their focus is subject’s ability to read and/or write. Schedule Y treats anyone who is unable to read or write in the same way. See the excerpt below. If the subject or his/her legally acceptable representative is unable to read/write - an impartial witness should be present during the entire informed consent process who must append his/her signatures to the consent form. While designing a protocol we found that there are high likely chances of worsening of some of the symptoms. Do we have to wait for these to happen and report it as SAE or in case we define them in the protocol upfront then can we prevent from expediting reporting it as SAE? Om Please see suggested guidance from ICH. Exemption from reporting such events would require prior agreement with regulatory authorities. ICH E3 12.2.2 Display of Adverse Events: All adverse events occurrin...
Post a Comment
Read more