Skip to main content

Novartis seeks regulatory consistency in India

Swiss multinational drug giant Novartis, which was among a few firms that suffered setbacks in the Indian market pertaining to patents protection and clinical trials, wants India to ensure consistency in the regulatory environment to retain and attract global investors.

Referring to episodes like overnight changes in key regulations governing clinical trials a few years back that destabilised investments of MNC pharma firms, Novartis global drug development head Vas Narasimhan said such inconsistencies send out wrong signals to investors. 

Narasimhan, who was in India to participate in Bio Asia 2017 conclave at Hyderabad, said sudden regulatory shifts will affect MNC drug companies, who make long-term investments in innovation. 

"We (multinationals) cannot simply keep adjusting. That sends a signal that maybe, we shouldn't invest as much," he told ET. 

Admitting that things have improved in consistency with rest of the world and the regulatory environment has got better now from both intellectual property and clinical trials' perspective, he said, such environment enables MNCs "invest with certainty over longer periods of time." 

However, he said "the key is it stays this way and keeps improving. Then, I think you will have more (clinical) trials coming in". 

Novartis currently conducts more than 50 clinical trials in India across all its therapeutic segments. 

Apart from ensuring consistency in regulatory policy environment, India should also allay the apprehensions of global investors at the earliest "so that it gives confidence to the principles all over the world because these clinical trials have been planned for long-term investments and they will have implications on global (drug) filings," Novartis India president Jawed Zia said.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BE guidelines regarding investigator

BE guidelines recommend investigator should possess appropriate medical qualification, experience for conducting pharmacokinetic studies Can chairperson of EC directly write to sponsor to clarify some of the queries of clinical trial raised in EC meeting? Dr. Sreevatsa Please see an extract from FDA's comment on IRB-sponsor relationship. The interrelationship and interaction between the research sponsor (e.g., drug, biologic and device manufacturers), the clinical investigator and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) may be very complex. The regulations do not prohibit direct sponsor-IRB contacts, although, the sponsor-IRB interaction customarily occurs through the investigator who conducts the clinical study. The clinical investigator generally provides the communication link between the IRB and the sponsor. Such linkage is agreed to by the sponsors and investigators when they sign forms FDA-1571 and FDA-1572, respectively, for drug and biologic studies or a...

ICH GCP requires EC members to be independent of investigator and sponsor to avoid conflicts of interest

Can an Ethics Committee member e.g. layman/chairman or anyone in the committee participate in the trial as a subject? Vidya If an Ethics Committee member becomes a trial subject on a trial that he/she was involved in approving then there has been a major conflict of interest. The following situations need to be considered: ● IEC member reviews study without any prior knowledge of the study, votes, and then afterwards is approached by clinical research team to participate. Possibly this is OK but the member should no longer be part of the IEC that reviews that study. This will be difficult in practice, so therefore it is not advisable. ● IEC member already knows about the study and is voting in order to be able to participate. This is clearly not acceptable and made worse if there is additional financial incentive for the study (e.g. volunteer study). ICH GCP requires Ethics Committee members to be independent of the investigator and the sponsor to avoid confl...

Combination Vaccine for Kids withdrawn

A vaccine that combines conventional MMR (Measles, Mumps, Rubella) with Chikenpox has been withdrawn in the United States due to a higher rate of seizures in children. In a study children aged 12 to 23 months who received the combined MMR cum Chickenpox vaccine had double the rate of seizures compared to children who got separate vaccine for MMR and chickenpox. This equates to one additional case of convulsion per 2000 vaccinations.