Skip to main content

ROLE OF ETHICS COMMITTEES

The most costly part of new drug discovery is the three phase clinical research lasting for three to four years involving thousands of human volunteers and investigators in multi locations. Any of these potential drug candidates can be abandoned during the trial period if their adverse drug events are beyond the acceptable limits. 

It is certainly a high risk activity involving millions of dollars and pharmaceutical companies usually make sure that trial reports reaching the regulatory authorities are favourable. No new drug can be approved for marketing without submission of trial reports and their scrutiny by the regulatory authorities. Because of these reasons, the whole operation  of clinical research is highly secretive. 

Apart from top MNCs like Pfizer, GSK, Novartis and Novo Nordisk, there are a large number of contract research organizations engaged in clinical trials in India for the last ten years.


As thousands of human subjects are recruited for each drug trial, the regulatory authorities have a responsibility to monitor the trial locations. And it is for this purpose, the Schedule Y of the Drugs & Cosmetics Act stipulates the existence of an ethics committee at each  trial site.  

But for many years, ethics committees have not been existing or non functional in India. It is this ineffectiveness of ethics committees that embolden the CROs and MNCs to carry out trials illegally endangering the lives of illiterate and  ignorant volunteers.

The decision of the Drug Technical Advisory Board to make registration of ethics committees mandatory at its meeting early last month is in consideration of this state of affairs. There has been several complaints about the non functioning of ethics committees at most of the trial sites. It is this situation that has led to a sharp rise in the number of cases of trial related deaths and injuries in the country during the last five years. 

Currently, ethics committees are constituted by the pharma companies or CROs intending to conduct trials but they are not required to be registered. For starting any clinical trial, the approval of the ethics committee is necessary as without which the DCGI do not permit the study in the country. But the ethics committees are not found to be responsible once the approval is given. No periodic meetings with investigators are called and no critical assessment of data is made. And there is no monitoring of the functioning of the ethics committee by the office of DCGI. 

The need to streamline activities of ethics committees is extremely urgent considering the growing  number of clinical trials taking place in the country. Making registration of ethics committees is an extremely critical step and needs to be strictly enforced without any delay.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BE guidelines regarding investigator

BE guidelines recommend investigator should possess appropriate medical qualification, experience for conducting pharmacokinetic studies Can chairperson of EC directly write to sponsor to clarify some of the queries of clinical trial raised in EC meeting? Dr. Sreevatsa Please see an extract from FDA's comment on IRB-sponsor relationship. The interrelationship and interaction between the research sponsor (e.g., drug, biologic and device manufacturers), the clinical investigator and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) may be very complex. The regulations do not prohibit direct sponsor-IRB contacts, although, the sponsor-IRB interaction customarily occurs through the investigator who conducts the clinical study. The clinical investigator generally provides the communication link between the IRB and the sponsor. Such linkage is agreed to by the sponsors and investigators when they sign forms FDA-1571 and FDA-1572, respectively, for drug and biologic studies or a...
Post a Comment
Read more

ICH GCP requires EC members to be independent of investigator and sponsor to avoid conflicts of interest

Can an Ethics Committee member e.g. layman/chairman or anyone in the committee participate in the trial as a subject? Vidya If an Ethics Committee member becomes a trial subject on a trial that he/she was involved in approving then there has been a major conflict of interest. The following situations need to be considered: ● IEC member reviews study without any prior knowledge of the study, votes, and then afterwards is approached by clinical research team to participate. Possibly this is OK but the member should no longer be part of the IEC that reviews that study. This will be difficult in practice, so therefore it is not advisable. ● IEC member already knows about the study and is voting in order to be able to participate. This is clearly not acceptable and made worse if there is additional financial incentive for the study (e.g. volunteer study). ICH GCP requires Ethics Committee members to be independent of the investigator and the sponsor to avoid confl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Combination Vaccine for Kids withdrawn

A vaccine that combines conventional MMR (Measles, Mumps, Rubella) with Chikenpox has been withdrawn in the United States due to a higher rate of seizures in children. In a study children aged 12 to 23 months who received the combined MMR cum Chickenpox vaccine had double the rate of seizures compared to children who got separate vaccine for MMR and chickenpox. This equates to one additional case of convulsion per 2000 vaccinations.
Post a Comment
Read more