Skip to main content

Good Clinical Practices


Clinical research is the key to the discovery of latest diagnostic methods and to develop modern drugs for treatment of diseases. Good Clinical Practices (GCP) is an ethical and scientific quality standard for designing, conducting and recording trials that involve the participation of human subjects. Compliance with this standard provides assurance to public that the rights, safety and well being of trial subjects are protected, consistent with the principles enshrined in the Declaration of Helsinki and ensures that clinical trial data are credible.  

It has been widely recognized that India offers unique opportunities for conducting clinical trials in view of the large patient pool, well- trained and enthusiastic investigators and premiere medical institutes available in the country along with considerable low per patient trial cost, as compared to developed countries.

A need was, however, felt to develop our own Indian Guidelines to ensure uniform quality of clinical research throughout the country and to generate data for registration for new drugs before use in the Indian population. An Expert Committee set up by Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) in consultation with clinical expert has formulated this GCP guideline for generation of clinical data on drugs. 

The Drug Technical Advisory Board (DTAB), the highest technical body under D&C, Act, has endorsed adoption of this GCP guideline for streamlining the clinical studies in India.


Contents 

 
            Introduction
1.            Definitions
2.                  Pre-requisites for the study
2.1.           Investigational Pharmaceutical Product
2.2.           Pre-Clinical supporting data
2.3.           Protocol
2.3.1.     Relevant components of Protocol
2.3.1.1.          General Information
2.3.1.2.          Objectives and Justification
2.3.1.3.          Ethical Considerations
2.3.1.4.          Study design
2.3.1.5.          Inclusion, Exclusion & Withdrawal of Subjects
2.3.1.6.          Handling of the Product(s)
2.3.1.7.          Assessment of Efficacy
2.3.1.8.          Assessment of Safety
2.3.1.9.          Statistics
2.3.1.10.      Data handling and management
2.3.1.11.      Quality control and quality assurance
2.3.1.12.      Finance and Insurance
2.3.1.13.      Publication policy
2.3.1.14.      Evaluation
2.3.2.     Supplementaries and appendices:

2.4.           Ethical & Safety Considerations
2.4.1.     Ethical Principles
2.4.2.     Ethics Committee
2.4.2.1.          Basic Responsibilities
2.4.2.2.          Composition
2.4.2.3.          Terms of Reference
2.4.2.4.          Review Procedures
2.4.2.5.          Submission of Application
2.4.2.6.          Decision Making Process
2.4.2.7.          Interim Review
2.4.2.8.          Record Keeping
2.4.2.9.          Special Considerations
2.4.3.     Informed Consent Process
2.4.3.1.          Informed Consent of Subject
2.4.3.2.          Essential information for prospective research subjects
2.4.3.3.          Informed Consent in Non-Therapeutic Study
2.4.4.     Essential Information on Confidentiality for Prospective Research Subjects
2.4.5.     Compensation for Participation
2.4.6.     Selection of Special Groups As Research Subject
2.4.6.1.          Pregnant or nursing women
2.4.6.2.          Children
2.4.6.3.          Vulnerable groups
2.4.7.     Compensation for Accidental Injury
2.4.7.1.          Obligation of the sponsor to pay
3.                  Responsibilities
3.1.           Sponsor
3.1.1.     Investigator and Institution Selection
3.1.2.     Contract
3.1.3.     SOP
3.1.4.     Allocation of duties and responsibilities
3.1.5.     Study management, data handling and record keeping
3.1.6.     Compensation for Participation
3.1.7.     Confirmation  of review by the Ethics Committee
3.1.8.     Information on Investigational Products
3.1.9.     Supply, storage and handling of Pharmaceutical Products
3.1.10  Safety Information
3.1.11  Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting
3.1.12  Study Reports
3.1.13  Monitoring
3.1.14  Audit
3.1.15  Multicentre Studies
3.1.16  Premature Termination or Suspension of a Study
3.1.17  Role of Foreign Sponsor
3.2.           The Monitor
3.2.1.     Qualifications
3.2.2.     Responsibilities
3.3.           Investigator
3.3.1.     Qualifications
3.3.2.     Medical Care of the Study Subjects
3.3.3.     Monitoring and Auditing of records
3.3.4.     Communication with Ethic Committee
3.3.5.     Compliance with the Protocol
3.3.6.     Investigational Product(s)
3.3.7.     Selection and recruitment of Study Subjects
3.3.8.     Records/Reports
4.                  Record Keeping and Data Handling
4.1.           Documentation
4.2.           Corrections
4.3.           Electronic Data Processing
4.4.           Validation of Electronic Data Processing Systems
4.5.           Language
4.6.           Responsibility of Investigator
4.7.           Responsibilities of Sponsor and Monitor
5.         Quality Assurance
6.                  Statistics
6.1.           Role of Biostatistician
6.2.           Study design
6.2.1.     Randomisation and Blinding
6.3.           Statistical Analysis
7.      Special Concerns
7.1.           Clinical Trials of Vaccines
7.1.1.     Phases of Vaccine Trials
7.1.2.     Guidelines
7.2.           Clinical Trials of  contraceptives
7.3.           Clinical Trials with Surgical Procedures / Medical devices.
7.3.1.     Definitions
7.3.2.     Guidelines
7.4.           Clinical Trials for Diagnostic agents - Use of radioactive materials and X-rays
7.4.1.     Guidelines
7.5.           Clinical Trials of Herbal Remedies and Medicinal Plants
7.5.1.     Categories of Herbal Product
7.5.2.     Guidelines
 
Appendices
Appendix I: Declaration of Helsinki
Appendix II: Schedule Y
Appendix III: Format for submission of Pre-clinical and clinical data for r-DNA based vaccines, diagnostics and other biologicals.
Appendix IV: Investigator's Brochure
Appendix V: Essential Documents

Good Clinical Practice Guidelines...continue reading here:  http://cdsco.nic.in/html/gcp1.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ICH GCP requires EC members to be independent of investigator and sponsor to avoid conflicts of interest

Can an Ethics Committee member e.g. layman/chairman or anyone in the committee participate in the trial as a subject? Vidya If an Ethics Committee member becomes a trial subject on a trial that he/she was involved in approving then there has been a major conflict of interest. The following situations need to be considered: ● IEC member reviews study without any prior knowledge of the study, votes, and then afterwards is approached by clinical research team to participate. Possibly this is OK but the member should no longer be part of the IEC that reviews that study. This will be difficult in practice, so therefore it is not advisable. ● IEC member already knows about the study and is voting in order to be able to participate. This is clearly not acceptable and made worse if there is additional financial incentive for the study (e.g. volunteer study). ICH GCP requires Ethics Committee members to be independent of the investigator and the sponsor to avoid confl...

Indian government outlines policies on drug pricing to favor poorer patients, and increase clinical trials

The Indian government is looking to review the existing drug price control measures in order to make medicines more affordable in the country, and at increasing the number of clinical trials taking place in the country, reports The Pharma Letter's India correspondent. In a parallel move, the Health Ministry is also preparing a framework for public private partnership to tackle the menace of non-communicable diseases in the country, In a move that could potentially result in affordable Medicare and health security moving to a larger section of the population, the government is considering a rash of policy measures in favor of poor patients. Talks are also on in government circles to abolish clinical trials on proven drugs that have been approved and marketed for at least two years in the European Union, United States, UK, Australia, Canada and Japan. A draft proposal in this regard has been prepared by the Health Ministry. If instituted, it would reduce the time taken to introduce n...

The polypill: Medicine's magic bullet

The capsule costs pennies, contains a simple cocktail of medicines, and halves the number of strokes and heart attacks. Doctors want to hand it out in the first mass medication for the middle-aged in Britain. So why are the big drug companies so uninterested? The magic bullet, containing five medicines in a single capsule, sharply reduced cholesterol and blood pressure levels and has the potential to "halve cardiovascular events in average middle-aged individuals", the researchers say. The finding is a major boost for a medication with huge potential against the worldwide epidemic of heart disease and stroke. Doctors say that, if further trials prove successful, all men aged over 50 and women aged over 60 should be offered the pill in what would be the first example of mass medication for the middle-aged in Britain. Yet no Western pharmaceutical company has shown interest in developing the so-called polypill because it does not promise big profits. It would sell for pennies b...