Skip to main content

New drugs without trials!

Image result for clinical trials

The Union health ministry is reported to be considering to do away with the mandatory three phase clinical trials before launching new drugs if they have proved their safety and efficacy in developed countries. For this exemption, these new drugs should have been approved and marketed for at least two years in the markets of European Union, UK, US, Australia, Canada and Japan. The health ministry already sent the draft proposal in this regard to the ministry of law and justice for clearance. Permission to market new drugs are usually granted by the regulatory authorities in any country including in India only after carefully assessing the adverse drug reactions during the clinical trials. 

The health ministry thinks that the decision can avoid unnecessary repetition of trials and speed up the introduction of new drugs in the country. The health ministry thinks that change in trial rules should make it easier for the pharmaceutical companies to introduce drugs in India which are already in use in regulated markets. Currently, apart from top MNCs like Pfizer, GSK, Novartis and Novo Nordisk, a large number of contract research organizations and Indian companies are doing clinical trials in India for more than 20 years.

The health ministry is probably right in holding the view that introduction of new drugs get delayed to the extend of five to six years in India after they are launched in the developed markets just because of the stipulation of fresh clinical trials in India too for marketing approval. Such a decision of the health ministry now will be of great advantage to multinational companies as they do not have to conduct highly expensive clinical trials, recruit subjects at high costs and wait for the approval of the regulatory authorities. And whatever new drugs are coming out are from the research labs of MNCs in the developed countries. 

Granting marketing permission to new drugs without clinical trials in India only on the ground that they are in the markets of developed countries for two years is may not be a perfect move. It is no secret that these developed countries had withdrawn some of the high profile drugs like rimonabant, rosiglitazone, nimesulide, cisapride and phenylpropanolamine from the market some years of their launches on account of serious side effects. And Indian drug regulator followed it up by recalling from Indian market also. 

All these drugs were introduced in various markets after three phase trials. No chemical drug is totally safe and a marketing permission is given after weighing the extent of benefit over its adverse reactions. Safety is more important than efficacy of a new drug so as to avoid serious injuries to patients. Therefore, a stricter evaluation of safety and efficacy of any new drug should be upon the regulators of individual countries.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FDA Restricts Use of Diabetes Drug Avandia

FDA Decides Not to Ban Avandia, but Puts Restrictions on How It’s Used.
By Daniel J. DeNoon
WebMD Health News

Sept. 23, 2010 -- The FDA will not ban Avandia -- but stringent restrictions will make it far harder for doctors to prescribe the safety-troubled diabetes drug.

The European Medicines Agency took harsher action. European sales of Avandia-containing drugs will be suspended over the next few months, although the agency did not formally withdraw approval.

The 600,000 U.S. patients currently taking Avandia can continue to take the drug only if their doctors officially attest that their patients understand the risks, that the drug is helping them, and that no other diabetes drug can keep their blood sugar under control.

New Avandia prescriptions can only be written for patients who, for medical reasons, cannot take Actos. Actos, a diabetes medication in the same class as Avandia, does not cause the heart problems linked to Avandia.

"Avandia will be available to new pat…

Isotretinoin in India: A tragedy in the offing

Isotretinoin in India: A tragedy in the offing
Wednesday, March 28, 2007 08:00 IST 
Seema Thakral

Isotretinoin is the drug of choice for severe calcitrant cystic acne vulgaris, which often causes scarring and depression from disfigurement. Isotretinoin has been called "the greatest medical advance of the 1980's." A majority of patients with acne are permanently cleared after a four to five months course of treatment. It has also been used off-label for a variety of oncology uses including: cervical cancer, head and neck cancer, squamous cell cancer of the skin, juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), and neuroblastoma. However, the drug is a proved teratogen and carries a significant risk of birth defects, if it taken during pregnancy. Birth defects, which have been documented following isotretinoin exposure include abnormalities of the face, eyes, ears, skull, central nervous system, cardiovascular system, and thymus and parathyroid glands. There is an increased risk …

The Influence of TheTourniquet on blood draw

[1] Various methods are used to obtain specimens for hematocritdetermination in neonates. We evaluated arterial sampling andfound this method to be acceptable. Arterial values correlatedclosely with simultaneously obtained venous samples. Venousblood obtained with a tourniquet had a significantly higherhematocrit than that obtained without a tourniquet.[2] Influence of tourniquet application on venous blood sampling for serum chemistry, hematological parameters, leukocyte activation and erythrocyte mechanical propertiesBackground: Venous blood sampling is usually performed using a tourniquet to help locate and define peripheral veins to achieve successful and safe venipuncture. Despite widespread usage of tourniquets for venipuncture by medical and laboratory staff, very few are aware of the effects of tourniquet application on laboratory parameters. In addition, definitive guidelines regarding when and how to use a tourniquet for blood sampling are lacking. The aim of the present stu…